Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Current »

Attendees: Michael Mustillo robert karban Esma Karagöz Olivier Cornes

Activity results:

  • AI4-17: Olivier Cornes 's diagram was accepted by me showing the top-level of what he intends to attack with AI. Esma Karagöz is thinking more generalizing for any analysis of a system, not necessarily aerospace

  • The general approach is great, but can we use Olivier’s intent to provide a practical example?

    • Paper reqts need foundation and practical demonstration

    • What aspects should we attack in what order?

image-20240227-171206.pngimage-20240227-171231.png
  • What are the objectives for our paper:

    • Create a SysML v2 model?

    • Create KGs form system descriptions? <--- this is the main part, which needs examples.

    • Should we work backwards from Research Area 1, to the middle blue part?

    • Agree on the achieving the blue part.

    • Don’t forget paper objectives, see Robert message

    • We are aiming for a technical, not vision paper, see again Robert’s message, requires rigorous formal proof:

      • Esma Karagöz No one in aero industry use an LLM for analysis, only NLP, which provides some novelty

    • Proposed objective:

      • Create several, rigorously proven extractions of correct KGs from system descriptions using LLMs, e.g. aircraft descriptions, etc., that performs better than human performance (or at least correct)?

        • We will need to refine this, and then once agreed, move backwards from there to what we need to do.

        • How will we measure this? Precision/recall/F1, etc.

  • Use of Gollie restricts us to NER only, per Olivier Cornes is this the only way?

  • What is a profile in our discussions?

  • What are the relations we are trying to extract?

  • No labels